Guilt-Free Expressions to Say, You Hurt My Feelings

When you are hurt, your first instinct is to retaliate. You want to hurt the other person to avenge the pain you are feeling. Revenge is sweet, but the repercussions can often create greater suffering. As Ken Kesey, the author of One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest, said, The man who seeks revenge digs two graves. Blinded by anger and wounded ego, hurt people often act recklessly. Thus they begin a circle of vengeance. History  is replete with stories of hurt and revenge. Mighty empires have crumbled because of misguided anger. Ego clashes have wiped out human life because of ensuing wars. So how can you assuage hurt feelings? Can you take back the words that hurt another? Just as cruel words can hurt someone, eloquent words of forgiveness can soothe the pain. When you seek unconditional forgiveness or atone for your misdeeds with a good deed, you can reverse the pain. If you have been hurt, you can use these you hurt me quotes to express your anguish. Theres no need for revenge or retaliation! A few sincere words are enough to communicate your pain. These words can have a powerful effect on your aggressors conscience. Oscar Wilde: A gentleman is one who never hurts anyones feelings unintentionally. Henry Wadsworth Longfellow: A torn jacket is soon mended, but hard words bruise the heart of a child. English Proverb: Anger is often more hurtful than the injury that caused it. Diana Ross: Criticism, even when you try to ignore it, can hurt. I have cried over many articles written about me, but I move on and I dont hold on to that. Lady Gaga: Do you know the feeling, when your heart is so hurt, that you could feel the blood dripping? Chris Rock: For me, anything goes when I pick up a mike. Im not trying to hurt people—I try not to get too personal but I look at myself as a reporter. If you can report on anything that has to do with pop culture, then why cant I make jokes about it? Yes, it hurts. But I figure that laughter sometimes starts from pain. You might wince, but then I know that Im doing my job. The only thing I can do wrong is not be funny. Ernest Hemingway: Forget your personal tragedy. We are all bitched from the start and you especially have to be hurt like hell before you can write seriously. But when you get the damned hurt, use it—dont cheat with it. Christina Aguilera: Im sorry for blaming you for everything I just couldnt do, and Ive hurt myself by hurting you. Klaus Kinski: Sometimes my heart hurts so much, I beat it with my fists. I try to run. But you cannot run from this. It waits for you. Even when you think you have escaped it, it is there. Les Brown: Forgive those who have hurt you. Alonzo Mourning: I was hurting. I had some ailments I was dealing with. Its not like I was holding out.

Top Advice on Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics

Top Advice on Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics The Argument About Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics You could also on similarities initially, then differences. Many diverse forms, many unique philosophies, which is the reason why a study of comparative governments is vital in the world we reside in. Simply create two overlapping circles, one for each one of the topics that you're comparing. There are a lot of ways where the manifestation of education shapes us, and that is the place where the value of being truly educated lies. As an example, something as easy as adding new info on your internet site creates another selling opportunity when prospects and customers go to your site in order to observe the new details. Customers are predicted to produce normal payments within 30 days. You will also want to have an established reputable firm. In the same way, there are lots of timeshare companies out there which are reputable, honest and who will bend over backwards to supply first class service to their clients. The Argument About Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics What you aspire to teach your reader will find out the form of your essay. When the writer has the information that will enter the essay, they should just begin writing! When it can be less difficult to write on a well-known topic, with a little bit of research and organization, a writer can make an essay on an assortment of subject areas if assigned. Once you finish your research notes you can begin writing with confidence that you have all of the pieces you ought to create a good essay. The conclusion seals the comparison essay and attempts to close the matter. The thesis statement stipulates the principal point of or ideas inside your essay. In addition, his vivid diction and understandable hyperbole led to the white audience to understand the error in their waysor at least consider his viewpoint. By doing this you can find a much better pictures of the essay which you ought to write about. Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics - What Is It? Each paragraph is going to have a topic sentence centered on the aspect you're comparing and contrasting. Although you'll have different conclusions in the conclusion of each paragraph throughout the text, you also have to have a conclusion as a distinct role in the conclusion of your essay. You would like to synthesize your thesis with the info in your body paragraphs. Now the thesis statement can be made, and the particular details can turn into the paragraphs. There are many categories of topics for you to pick from. The solution is in the simple fact your tutor want to teach you to develop your analytical and argumentative skills. All you need to do is glance at your Venn diagram to find a feeling of the things which you could write about. Each APUSH essay option focuses on the exact same themes and writing requirements, so pick the period of time that most fits your skill collection. Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics - the Conspiracy Fitzgerald and Gatsby are at two unique extremes when it has to do with drinking. The work, which demands the complete attention and a crystal clear mind. Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics - What Is It? Each circle represents one particular subject. In a number of sections of text's key body you are supposed to demonstrate different contrast or compare points. Then you would concentrate on men within the next section. Don't rush, and work through the outline one section at one time i f you want to. The Good, the Bad and Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics Members are called peers. First you discuss the very first subject. Students lead busy lives and frequently forget about a coming deadline. In order to reach true education, they must reach the mindset where they know they have control, and they use it to extract the most of the education and opportunities they have been given. Compare and Contrast Apush Essay Topics - the Conspiracy Choose the topic in which you feel you're confident of the start and more confident of leading it to an appropriate conclusion. My lectures give students an opportunity to escape their seats. From 1890 to 1920, the Progressive Movement fostered a whole lot of political shift in america.

A Personalised Induction Will Always Be More Effective Free Essays

string(61) " comply with suggestions that do not conform to their likes\." Introduction A personalised induction is a type of hypnotic induction that is designed to suit a certain individual. As humans, we appear to share the same traits, but in reality, we are different in various ways. This is because we have different likes, dislikes, perspectives, values, and we have diverse cultural backgrounds. We will write a custom essay sample on A Personalised Induction Will Always Be More Effective or any similar topic only for you Order Now Because of these unique differences, everyone has his or her way of handling various situations, and every individual has a different level of openness and resistance (Chapman 2006, p.113). Consequently, during hypnosis, it is worthwhile for the hypnotist to adopt a personalised approach because each participant has unique traits, and people normally respond to the hypnotic process in different ways. The personalised approach takes into account the client’s desires, perceptions, likes, dislikes, as well as their cultural background (James 2006, p.30). Thus, by personalising the induction, hypnotherapists can help their clients to realize better quality results that are in line with each of the client’s goals. . In this essay, I argue that a personalised induction approach will always be more effective. As humans, we communicate with each other in various ways including gestures, facial expressions, body language, as well as tone of voice and intonation. However, during hypnosis, the hypnotist has limited techniques of communication available since the clients have their eyes closed. For instance, he or she cannot adopt non-verbal communication techniques, and this makes the message or the instructions he or she is sending to weaken. Thus, it is necessary for the hypnotist to adopt other appropriate techniques of strengthening the message being conveyed to the clients. In order to do this effectively, the hypnotist can personalise the way he or she speaks to the clients by adopting different words, tone variation, volume, and pace, but ensuring the message remains unchanged (Erickson, Rossi Ryan 1998, p.37-59). Milton H. Erickson commonly referred to as the father of contemporary hypnotherapy recognised that people have different beliefs, values, perceptions, and cultural backgrounds, and consequently, throughout his career as a psychiatrist, he adopted the personalised induction as the best tool for hypnosis. Erickson differed with Hull’s opinion that the subject should always be a passive participant. According to Hull (1933/1968), adoption of a standardized induction would have the same effect on all the subjects (Hawkins 2006, p.36). Difference of opinion between these two great psychiatrists fuelled Erickson’s quest for a valid understanding of the best approach to the hypnotic induction. Later on, Erickson concluded that it is what the subjects do and understands that matters most, not what the operator wishes. In other words, he believed that in order to realize quality results of the therapy, the subjects must be active participants, and the suggestions given by the th erapist ought to concur with the client’s desires, perceptions, values, and goals of the therapy (Zeig Munion, 1999, p.48-51). Permissive and the authoritarian technique Erickson developed the idea that hypnosis is a natural process that needed a more viable approach such as the permissive technique, because it enhances the client’s responsiveness and cooperation. The permissive technique acknowledges that every individual has unique traits, values, perceptions, and desires. It is normally based on the assumption that every person has a unique way of entering into a trance state and receiving suggestions. In this approach, most of the clients know how to relax and enter a trance state, since the hypnotist briefs every client on how the process takes place at the start. As a result, the hypnotist simply acts as a guide as the subjects enters into a hypnotic state (Simpkins 2001, p.53). Before Erickson pioneered the permissive technique, the authoritative technique was the only available technique that was deemed effective. . The authoritative approach is commanding and direct, and its main objective is usually to establish control over the clie nt and modify his or her behaviour through adoption of repetitive commands. Pioneers of this approach believed that by establishing control over their clients, they would be able to increase the chances of getting remarkable results. However, this approach does not produce effective results as asserted by its pioneers since the subjects, who respond in a positive way to it, are only those who respect their authoritarian figures in their daily lives. As a result, authoritative technique can fail to produce quality results if the participant believes in being at the same level with all the authoritarian figures in his or her live (Sheehan 2005, p.67-70). Unlike the authoritative approach, the permissive technique mainly involves adoption of a soft tone to lull the client into relaxation. Throughout this approach, the client and the hypnotist are usually equal partners. Furthermore, more imagery is employed to increase the magnitude of the suggestions. The subject is also given greater responsibility. Since personalised imagery is incorporated in this technique, the induction becomes more real and viable than in the authoritative approach, since the suggestions used by the hypnotist conform to the clients likes and expectations (Sheehan 2005, p.70-72). Clark Hull and Sigmund Freud’s research on hypnosis Despite Erickson’s insistence on the value of the permissive technique, some people object the personalised induction approach. They claim that the personalised induction approach takes more time than the authoritative approach. Moreover, they support their stance by citing some of the works of the great traditional researchers such as Clark Hull and Sigmund Freud. Arguments involving state and the role theory are also used to analyze Erickson’s position. Hull differed with Erickson’s perspective and on the contrary, he proposed the authoritarian technique, which makes the subject a passive participant (Pintar Lynn, 2009, p.112). He believed that adoption of a standardized approach would yield the same results on all the subjects. In 1940, Jung (1902/1957) backed him in his research, but Jung was not comfortable in using the authoritarian technique, because it involved commanding clients to do according to their therapist’s expectations. According to Jung ’s perspective, participants ought to be involved throughout the process instead of directing then to comply with suggestions that do not conform to their likes. You read "A Personalised Induction Will Always Be More Effective" in category "Essay examples" Consequently, Jung broke away from Hull’s research (Hamill 2012, p.24). Based on this, it is clear that the authoritarian approach is not viable, and as a result, it is not logical to oppose the personalised approach based on Hull’s perspective since he does not take into account preferences and expectations of the participants. In addition, Freud’s research asserts that the process of hypnosis would give better results when the subject was on deep trance. Like Hull, Freud adopted the authoritarian technique in a more assertive manner hoping that he would get better results (Sofroniou 2010, p.12). He was particularly interested in the technique because he believed that it was the perfect way of accessing forgotten events and emotions, a cathartic process, which gave relief to his clients. However, Freud became uncomfortable with hypnosis because his patients did not respond uniformly to the process. He was also afraid that the direct suggestion technique might do away with symptoms that were important for the clients to retain. In addition, Freud had worries over the sexual perceptions that surrounded the hypnotic process, which labelled a client as ‘giving herself’ emotionally to the psychiatrist. Because of these reasons, as well as lack of sufficient experience with hypnosis both throu gh research and clinically, Freud decided to quit hypnosis (Zeig Munion 1999, p.48-49). If Freud had adopted the permissive approach, he would have succeeded because the personalised approach relies on suggestions that are in line with the client’s expectations, desires and likes, and as a result, the clients could not lose any important symptom. The permissive technique would also help him to eliminate the ill-sexual perception, since it gives the client greater responsibility unlike the authoritarian technique. State and the role theory Advocates of the state theory, which asserts that hypnotic induction arouses a unique modified state of consciousness in the patient, base their argument on the notable changes that occur to the brain during hypnosis, and to the dramatic effects, which hypnosis can cause such as the disappearance of warts and insensitivity to pain. They also claim that sometimes, both hypnotised and non-hypnotised participants take instructions differently. For instance, in a certain study, both the hypnotised and non-hypnotised were told to run their hands through their hair once they heard the word ‘experiment.’ The pretenders carried out the suggestion only when the psychiatrist said the word, but the hypnotised participants complied regardless of who gave the suggestion (Coon, Mitterer, Talbot Vanchella, 2010, p.194). Based on this, opponents of the personalised induction claim that the authoritative approach is as effective as the permissive approach. They support their claim by as serting that participants who do not respond to the permissive technique can respond to the authoritarian technique effectively, particularly those who respect authoritarian figures in their life. Moreover, advocates of the role theory assert that hypnosis is not a special state of consciousness. They argue that some of the changes linked with hypnosis can also take place without it. They claim that hypnotised people just comply with the demands of the situation, and act in conformity with a special role. From this point of view, hypnosis provides a socially logical reason to comply with someone’s suggestions, in the same way as a physical exam, which provides a logical reason of removing clothes on request. Supporters of the role theory justify their claims by arguing that non-hypnotised participants sometimes exhibit behaviours that are usually linked with hypnosis (Bernstein Nash, 2008, p.153). Based on this, I disagree with the opponents of the personalised induction who adopt the role theory to support their stance, because the theory rejects the idea of hypnosis without providing concrete reasons. The dissociation theory The dissociation theory provides substantial reasons why the personalised inductions should be adopted during the hypnotic process. The theory suggests that hypnosis is not a single specific state, but the general condition, which temporarily reorganises our normal control over actions and thoughts. Dissociation allows body movements to occur under voluntary control and the involuntary processes to be controlled voluntarily. As Hilgard proposed this theory, he asserted that the relaxation of control occurs because of the social agreement between the hypnotist and the hypnotised person to share control (Bernstein Nash, 2008, p.153-154). In other words, the theory supports the idea that for the process to be effective, the participant should be an active participant, something advocated in the personalised induction approach. Modern hypnosis Based on contemporary hypnosis, a personalised induction seems to be the most effective approach in hypnosis. The approach takes into account the client’s values, desires, and it views the subjects as active participants. It also supports the idea that it is imperative to have the patient as relaxed as possible, get them involved in the in the process, and discuss the expectations and goals of attending the therapy with the client. Furthermore, the modern hypnotherapist starts the therapy session by establishing a rapport with their patients, which is a key aspect of the personalised induction approach (Gaschler 2009, p.21). In the course of the personalised induction, strong relationships between the clients and the therapist are necessary in order to ensure the client is fully involved in the process. Learning Modalities Overtime, personalised induction has stood out as the best because it takes into consideration learning modalities, which are key channels through which people receive, store, and give information. Modality is comprised of perception, sensation, and memory and the key senses include smell, taste, visual, auditory, and kinaesthetic. Knowledge of modalities enables therapists to personalise screeds for each client. When a patient’s modalities are ascertained, it becomes easy to discuss with them in a way that makes them feel comfortable and relaxed (Hogan LaBay 2007, p.226-239). As a result, it becomes easy to achieve the objective of the therapy. Conclusion The above discussion has suggested that personalised induction is more effective than the authoritarian approach. This is because we have different likes, dislikes, desires, perceptions, and we come from different cultural backgrounds. Consequently, to achieve remarkable results in the process of hypnosis, the hypnotist should take into consideration all this aspects. Although a standardized approach (authoritative approach) can be effective in some instances, it only works on subjects who respect the authoritative figures. Moreover, the authoritative technique assumes that all people react in the same manner to suggestions. However, this should not be the case since we possess different traits. Thus, the personalised induction or the permissive approach is the only method through which noteworthy results can be achieved during the hypnotic process, since it acknowledges that we have different likes, dislikes, perceptions and that we come from diverse cultural backgrounds. References Bernstein, D. A., Nash, P. W. (2008). Essentials of psychology. Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin. Chapman, R. A. (2006). The clinical use of hypnosis in cognitive behavior therapy a practitioner’s casebook. New York, NY, Springer Pub. Coon, D., Mitterer, J. O., Talbot, S., Vanchella, C. M. (2010). Introduction to psychology: gateways to mind and behavior. Belmont, Calif, Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Erickson, M. H., Rossi, E. L., Ryan, M. O. (1998). Mind-body communication in hypnosis. London, Free Association. Gaschler, T. (2009). Modern hypnosis techniques Pt. 1. Pt. 1. [Bad Sachsa], Steiner. Hamill, D. (2012). An Introduction to Hypnosis Hypnotherapy. Bolton, MA, eBookIt.com. Hawkins, P. (2006). Hypnosis and stress a guide for clinicians. Chichester, England, Wiley. Hogan, K., LaBay, M. (2007). Through the Open Door: Secrets of Self-hypnosis. Gretna, Louisiana: Pelican Publishing. James, U. (2006). Clinical hypnosis textbook: a guide for practical intervention. Oxford, Radcliffe Publishing. Pintar, J., Lynn, S. J. (2009). Hypnosis a Brief History. Chichester, John Wiley Sons Sheehan, L. (2005). Basic Hypnosis Manual. Raleigh, North Carolina: Lulu. Simpkins, C. A. (2001). Self-Hypnosis: Plain and Simple. Tuttle Pub. Sofroniou, A. (2010). The misinterpretation of Sigmund Freud. [Raleigh, N.C. ], Lulu Com. Zeig, J. K., Munion, W. M. (1999). Milton H. Erickson. London, Sage Publications. How to cite A Personalised Induction Will Always Be More Effective, Essay examples