Mercy Otis Warren As A Leader Of The Revolution - 1008 Words

Mercy Otis Warren was one of the few women to give public voice to her political sentiments. Mercy was the sister of James Otis, a leader of the Revolution. She wrote several satirical plays and corresponded with many prominent figures in colonial society, including Samuel Adams, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Elbridge Gerry and Alexander Hamilton. She maintained an especially close contact with Jordan and Abigail Adams. She structured her political comments within plays, none of which she preformed on stage because Mercy has specifically written them for publication in the newspapers. Through her plays Mercy revealed her contempt for the Tory Administration in Boston and her passion for Whig ideology. â€Å"Mercy believed that a women’s primary focus should be her family, but asserted that it was important for women to be aware of politics in order to better serve their families.† (Volo, 2003) Warren was among the women who chose to publish their views. Women wer e active ad printers and publishers during the war. Women who feared criticism for meddling too directly in politics published their poems and letters into the newspaper anonymously. In 1772, Warren published anonymously her â€Å"biting satire of Royal Governor Thomas Hutchinson, The Adulator. First appearing in two installments in the Massachusetts Spy, the play ended with a warning that the people might take up arms.† (Gundersen,1996) She wrote two more plays on political themes by 1774 and pamphlets, all appearingShow MoreRelatedMercy Otis Warren: A Brief Biography991 Words   |  4 PagesMercy accomplished lots of things that women did not even know could exist in her time. Mercy Otis Warren was a writer a poet, historian, dramatist, a patriot propagandist, play writer and a satirist in the eighteenth century. She was born in west Barnstable, Massachusetts in the United States of America which is named Cape Cod on September 14th, 1728. And died in her hometown on Octobe r 19, 1814. She was one of the first women to write about the war in the American Revolution. She spoke up and foughtRead MoreJames Madison on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights Essay1010 Words   |  5 Pagesopponents of this new constitution was Mercy Otis Warren. She was an extremely well educated woman and a member of a family of distinguished revolutionary leaders (Warren 160). She wrote about her thoughts and the problems that she saw with the new constitution 10 years after the Constitutional Convention took place. She believed federalists such as James Madison were actually turning the country into the same exact state it was in before the American Revolution. Warren compared Madison’s idea of a republicRead MoreAnalysis Of Eve Kornfeld s Creating An American Culture 1775-1800995 Words   |  4 Pagessides as to what the American Revolution was about so, â€Å"If they wished to preserve their image unsullied by European incursions, Americans would have to deve lop their own narratives of nationhood† (Kornfeld, 40). This brought a movement of amateur writers creating historical documents about their local history tendentiously because they were writing about the places they cherished and called home. This can even be seen in some non-amateur scholars such as Mercy Otis Warren, who in her documents aboutRead MoreIdeology Behind American Revolution Essays1890 Words   |  8 PagesThe American Revolution was predicated by a number of ideas and events that, combined, led to a political and social separation of colonial possessions from the home nation and a coalescing of those former individual colonies into an independent nation. Summary The American revolutionary era began in 1763, after a series of victories by British forces at the conclusion of the French and Indian War (also, Seven Years War) ended the French military threat to British North American colonies. AdoptingRead MoreHow Effective Were The Sons Of Liberty?. The Sons Of Liberty1228 Words   |  5 PagesHoneymoon cottage that was a one story with an attic. James Otis Jr. was born February 5, 1725 in West Barnstable, Massachusetts. He was the second child of thirteen children and he was the first to survive infancy. James sister Mercy Otis Warren, his brother Joseph otis and his younger brother Samuel Allyne Otis. His sister, brother, and younger brother became leaders of the American Revolution, same with his nephew Harrison Gray Otis. In 1755, he married â€Å"the beautiful Ruth Cunningham†. They hadRead MoreSimilarities Between The Federalists And Federalist791 Words   |  4 Pagesthe Constitution. Instead, they wanted the state governments to keep the power. The Federalists disagreed because they wanted a government that was stronger on the national level and that had the Constitution to manage tensions and debts from the Revolution. They both differed in many ways, but one way that they were similar was because they had an impact on the way the Constitution was written. Federalists lived mostly in cities and not only supported but originally came up with the ConstitutionRead MoreThe Rartifiation of the Us Constitution1046 Words   |  5 Pagesin negotiation, and anti-federalists were individuals who wanted a weaker central government. George Washington and the federalists argued that a stronger central government would accommodate everyone including farmers and merchants. Meanwhile, the leader of the anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, reasoned that the development of this constitution may threaten the rights of people in the states. While the federalists and anti-federalists were arguing over how much power the government should hold, theyRead MoreThe Generation Of The United States4076 Words   |  17 Pagesstate and federal sovereignty. In addition, to fight in the revolution and win against Britain’s best army and navy, the U.S. had to carve its own path with unprecedented steps. Dues to the challenges the republic faced and overcame, the founding of the United States is truly phenomenal in Ellis’s eyes. 2) When Ellis writes about the need to see farsighted when looking at the founding of our country, he is referring to the political leaders in the revolutionary generation who saw the advantages andRead MoreApush Chapter 7 Outline Essay4627 Words   |  19 Pagesand deviant behavior. 6. Washington Irving, a resident of New York State who won wide acclaim for his satirical histories of early American life and his powerful fables of society in the New World. 7. Mercy Otis Warren continued her literary efforts with a three volume History of the Revolution, published in 1805 and emphasizing the heroism of the American struggle. 8. Mason Weems’ Life of Washington portrayed the aristocratic former president as homespun man possessing simple republican virtuesRead MoreManagement Course: Mba−10 General Management215330 Words   |  862 PagesFourth Edition I. Management 17 17 2. The Evolution of Management Thought Hughes−Ginnett−Curphy †¢ Leadership, Fifth Edition I. Leadership is a Process, Not a Position 51 51 70 1. Leadership is Everyone’s Business 2. Interaction between the Leader, the Followers the Situation Cohen †¢ Effective Behavior in Organizations, Seventh Edition 11. Leadership: Exerting Influence and Power 94 94 Text Palmer−Dunford−Akin †¢ Managing Organizational Change 2. Images of Managing Change 121 121

Predicting Performance Free Essays

Mix between current method and intelligence test. Evaluate Alternatives: 1. Intelligence tests. We will write a custom essay sample on Predicting Performance or any similar topic only for you Order Now If Intelligence tests are used by corporations to screen Job applicants, colleges could use the same methodology. Also this will give a future opportunity for the students after graduation, to be familiar with this kind of test. Also corporations looking new employees will be confident that the graduated students have already passed the intelligence test, so they can give priority for students graduated from New England College. In addition the New England College, based on this alternative, could do agreement with potential recruiters, to give priority for student graduated from the college as they can ensure their Intelligence level. This will give an advantage to overcome any possibility of discrimination and to be more fair for poor and minorities, as it will be based on real evaluation for intelligence level for students. 2. Keep existing selection criteria. As Alex has no prior experience in college admissions, and in the same time she didn’t eave enough time to collect all data and verify It by real study. All her reservations about using SAT scores based on concerns, the only evidence Is that coaching improves the SAT score. So keeping the current selection criteria will overcome the risk of failure in case of any change in the process of selection, also as the people who design the SAT argue forcefully that these test scores are valid predictors of how well a person will do in college. But Alex could gain time during keeping the current selection process to collect and analysis data before thinking about other alternative o challenge this argue. . MIX between current method and Intelligence test. As SAT Is only three sections Mathematics, Critical Reading, and Writing. It Is preferable also to measure the intelligence of the students. For this it’s required to redistribute the scoring as per the below. High school grades (20 %); Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores (30 %); Intelligence tests scores (30 %); Extra-curricular activities and achievements (10 %); And the quality a nd creativity of a written theme submitted with the application This alternative will make the selection criteria based on measuring the mathematics; critical reading and writing in addition to the proper intelligence level, and avoid discrimination for poor and minorities. Taking into account the students character and their ability to manage activities and have achievement, and their ability to express their writing capabilities and creativity. Also this alternative will have the advantages of first alternative. Recommendations: To use the third alternative by having mix between current methods and intelligence test. How to cite Predicting Performance, Papers

Emperor Claudius Essay Example For Students

Emperor Claudius Essay Tiberius Claudius Nero Germanicus (b. 10 BC, d. 54 A. D. ; emperor, 41-54 A. D. ) was the third emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. His reign represents a turning point in the history of the Principate for a number of reasons, not the least for the manner of his accession and the implications it carried for the nature of the office. During his reign he promoted administrators who did not belong to the senatorial or equestrian classes, and was later vilified by authors who did. He followed Caesar in carrying Roman arms across the English Channel into Britain but, unlike his predecessor, he initiated the full-scale annexation of Britain as a province, which remains today the most closely studied corner of the Roman Empire. His relationships with his wives and children provide detailed insights into the perennial difficulties of the succession problem faced by all Roman Emperors. His final settlement in this regard was not lucky: he adopted his fourth wifes son, who was to reign catastrophically as Nero and bring the dynasty to an end. Claudiuss reign, therefore, was a mixture of successes and failures that leads into the last phase of the Julio-Claudian line. Early Life (10 BC 41 A. D. ) Claudius was born on 1 August 10 BC at Lugdunum in Gaul, into the heart of the Julio-Claudian dynasty: he was the son of Drusus Claudius Nero, the son of Augustuss wife Livia, and Antonia, the daughter of Mark Antony. His uncle, Tiberius, went on to become emperor in AD 14 and his brother Germanicus was marked out for succession to the purple when, in AD 4, he was adopted by Tiberius. It might be expected that Claudius, as a well-connected imperial prince, would have enjoyed the active public life customary for young men of his standing but this was not the case. In an age that despised weakness, Claudius was unfortunate enough to have been born with defects. He limped, he drooled, he stuttered and was constantly ill. His family members mistook these physical debilities as reflective of mental infirmity and generally kept him out of the public eye as an embarrassment. A sign of this familial disdain is that he remained under guardianship, like a woman, even after he had reached the age of majority. Suetonius, in particular, preserves comments of Antonia, his mother, and Livia, his grandmother, which are particularly cruel in their assessment of the boy. From the same source, however, it emerges that Augustus suspected that there was more to this idiot than met the eye. Nevertheless, Claudius spent his entire childhood and youth in almost complete seclusion. The normal tasks of an imperial prince came and went without official notice, and Claudius received no summons to public office or orders to command troops on the frontiers How he spent the voluminous free time of his youth is revealed by his later character: he read voraciously. He became a scholar of considerable ability and composed works on all subjects in the liberal arts, especially history; he was the last person known of who could read Etruscan. These skills, and the knowledge of governmental institutions he acquired from studying history, were to stand him in good stead when he came to power. His father died on campaign when Claudius was only one year old, and his brother, Germanicus, succumbed under suspicious circumstances in AD 19. His only other sibling to reach adulthood, Livilla, became involved with Sejanus and fell from grace in AD 31. Through all this turmoil Claudius survived, primarily through being ignored as an embarrassment and an idiot. Claudiuss fortunes changed somewhat when his unstable nephew, Gaius (Caligula), came to power in the spring of 37 A. D. Gaius, it seems, liked to use his bookish, frail uncle as the butt of cruel jokes and, in keeping with this pattern of behavior, promoted him to a consulship on 1 July 37 A. D. At 46 years of age, it was Claudiuss first public office. Despite this sortie into public life, he seemed destined for a relatively quiet and secluded dotage when, in January 41, events overtook him. The Early Years: Britain, Freedmen, and Messalina (AD 41 48) Among Claudiuss first acts was the apprehension and execution of Gaiuss assassins. Whatever his opinion of their actions, politics required that Claudius not be seen to condone men who murdered an emperor and a member of his own family. ] He also displayed immediate understanding of the centrality of the military to his position and sought to create a military image for himself that his prior sheltered existence had denied him. Preparations got under way soon after his accession for a major military expedition into Britain, perhaps sparked by an attempted revolt of the governor of Dalmatia, L. Arruntius Camillus Scribonianus, in 42 A. D. The invasion itself, spearheaded by four legions, commenced in the summer of 43 and was to last for decades, ultimately falling short of the annexation of the whole island (if indeed that was Claudiuss final objective at the outset). This move marked the first major addition to the territory of the Roman Empire since the reign of Augustus. The Novel ' The Kite Runner ' EssayAll of these are sure signs of preference in the ever-unstable imperial succession schemes. No matter what the reasons were, there can be little doubt that Nero, despite his tender age, had been clearly marked out as Claudiuss successor. Agrippina, according to Tacitus, now decided it was time to dispose of Claudius to allow Nero to take over. The ancient accounts are confused as is habitual in the cases of hidden and dubious deaths of emperors but their general drift is that Claudius was poisoned with a treated mushroom, that he lingered a while and had to be poisoned a second time before dying on 13 October 54 A. D. At noon that same day, the sixteen-year-old Nero was acclaimed emperor in a carefully orchestrated piece of political theater. Already familiar to the army and the public, he faced no serious challenges to his authority. Claudius and the Empire The invasion and annexation of Britain was by far the most important and significant event in Claudiuss reign. But several other issues deserve attention: his relationship with and treatment of the aristocracy, his management of the provinces and their inhabitants, and his judicial practices, and his building activities. Claudiuss relationship with the Senate did not get off to a good start given the nature of his succession and it seems likely that distrust of the aristocracy is what impelled Claudius to elevate the role of his freedmen. During his reign, however, Claudius made efforts to conciliate Romes leading council, but he also embarked on practices that redounded to his detriment, especially those of sponsoring the entrance men considered unworthy into the Order and hearing delicate cases behind closed doors (in camera). 5 senators and several hundred Knights were driven to suicide or executed during the reign. The vilification of Claudius in the aristocratic tradition also bespeaks a deep bitterness and indicates that, ultimately, Claudiuss relationship with the Senate showed little improvement over time. His reviving and holding the censorship in 47-48 is typical of the way the relationship between Senate and emperor misfired: Claudius, no doubt, thought he was adhering to ancient tradition, but the emperor-censor only succeeded in eliciting odium from those he was assessing. Claudius was remembered (negatively) by tradition as being noticeably profligate in dispensing grants of Roman citizenship to provincials; he also admitted Gauls into the senatorial order, to the displeasure of the snobbish incumbents. Both of these practices demonstrate his concern for fair play and good government for the provinces, despite his largely inactive reign: In the organization of the provinces, Claudius appears to have preferred direct administration over client kingship. Under him the kingdoms of Mauretania, Lycia, Noricum, and Thrace were converted into provinces. Stable kingdoms, such as Bosporus and Cilicia, were left untouched. One feature of Claudiuss reign that the sources particularly criticize is his handling of judicial matters. While he was certainly diligent in attending to hearings and court proceedings he was constantly present in court and heard cases even during family celebrations and festal days the sources accuse him of interfering unduly with cases, of not listening to both sides of a case, of making ridiculous and/or savage rulings, and of hearing delicate cases in closed-door private sessions with only his advisors present. Finally, there are Claudiuss building activities. Public building was essential for Roman emperors, and ancient accounts of individual reigns routinely include mention of imperial munificence. Matters hydraulic account for Claudiuss greatest constructional achievements, in the form of a new aqueduct for the city of Rome, a new port at Portus near Ostia, and the draining of the Fucine Lake. The sources are at pains to highlight the almost catastrophic outcome of the latter project, but its scale cannot be denied. Suetoniuss assessment that his public works were grandiose and necessary rather than numerous is entirely correct. Conclusion In addition to his scholarly and cautious nature, he had a cruel streak, as suggested by his addiction to gladiatorial games and his fondness for watching his defeated opponents executed. He conducted closed-door trials of leading citizens that frequently resulted in their ruin or deaths an unprecedented and tyrannical pattern of behavior. He had his wife Messalina executed, and he personally presided over a court in the Praetorian Camp in which many of her hangers-on lost their lives. He abandoned his own son Britannicus to his fate and favored the advancement of Nero as his successor. At the same time, his reign was marked by some notable successes: the invasion of Britain, stability and good government in the provinces, and successful management of client kingdoms. Claudius, then, is a more enigmatic figure than the other Julio-Claudian emperors: at once careful, intelligent, aware and respectful of tradition, but given to bouts of rage and cruelty, willing to sacrifice precedent to expediency, and utterly ruthless in his treatment of those who crossed him. Augustuss suspicion that there was more to the timid Claudius than met the eye was more than fully borne out by the events of his unexpected reign.